

that is one target-rich environment for fisking.Īnyway, it's easy to poke fun of the smaller, tangential blunders Day makes - in response to Dawkins' complaint, for example, Day says: There's a lot of the book I haven't read yet, but just from what I have, I can say. Now, I've only read just a few pages of the opening of The Irrational Atheist, and have now read through Chapter VIII, "Darwin's Judas" just as means of familiarizing myself with the arguments being advanced on the email loop, and I guess I've been out of the loop for a while with respect to the mensa-punk-apologist groove that's happening out there.

Beale's "take down" of Dawkin's complaint that "A God capable of calculating the Goldilocks values for the six numbers would have to be at least as improbable as the finely tuned combination of numbers itself”. In particular, theistic friends find Mssr. On a private email loop, I've been getting bits and pieces of Vox Day offered by way of theistic argumentation.
